UNLESS THERE IS A VALID REASON FOR THIS DECISION OF REMOVAL BEHIND CLOSED DOORS OF NATIONAL SECURITY…
I RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE WITH THE DECISION…
THE SENTENCE IS DISPROPORTIONATE TO THE DECISION
WHERE THERE IS A DEMONSTRATED HISTORY OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY BY SOMEONE GRANTED CANADIAN STATUS
THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ARE HARMFULL ON THE BASIS OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS, CHARTER RIGHTS, INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS
USING THIS SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL AS A LITMUS TEST EXAMPLE…
IT IS ALMOST BEING PERCEIVED AS WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TODAY
THE FORCEFUL REMOVAL OF INDIVIDUALS CONTRIBUTING TO THE BETTERMENT OF EVERYONE IN CANADA AND BY COMPARISON UNITED STATES
YES MANY ARE HERE ILLEGALLY…
BUT BY THE SAME ACTION… GOVERNMENTS HAVE TURNED BLIND EYES TO SAID PROBLEM OVER DECADES BY LACK OF ACTION NIPPING IT IN THE BUD LONG AGO
IF CONTRIBUTIONS ARE POSITIVE… THEN GRANT LEGAL STATUS
OTHERWISE DEPORT
CRIMINALS SHOULD NOT ENJOY FREEBIES
AS TO MULTIPLE PASSPORTS…
I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH IT…
CHOOSE ONE OF IMPORTANCE AND LIVE BY IT’S TERMS AND CONDITIONS
IT’S A FREE WORLD, PEOPLE SHOULD BE ABLE AND ALLOWED TO TRAVEL AS THEY PLEASE
AS LONG AS THEY DON’T IMPORT DANGER TO WHERE THEY TRAVEL
APLLY LAWS AS REQUIRED
BUT CERTAINLY THIS CASE SHOULD PROCEED ON APPEAL AND INDIVIDUAL SHOULD BE GRANTED TEMPORARY STAY UNTIL MATTER IS ULTIMATELY DECIDED
Live~NRGY 
Leave a comment