Hmmm, I’ll add another bit of defining words to the term of ‘FAKE’ N.E.W.S.
CRITICAL QUESTION…
WHEN IS THE N.E.W.S. NOT THE ENTIRE STORY ???
CRITICAL ANSWER…
WHEN IT EVADES BY CHOICE TO FULLY AVOID COVERING ALL THE CARDINAL COMPASS POINTS OF THE MEASURE OF CRITICAL THINKING & MORAL/EHTICAL MEASURES OF IT’S TIME
CASE IN POINT…
MY ATTENTION BROUGHT TO NEW LIGHT OF A SENATOR WHOSE OWN MORAL GUIDANCE SHOULD HAVE BEEN CRYSTAL CLEAR BY WAY OF FAITH & RELIGION
AS I SEE IT… MOST MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS HAVE FAILED THE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SET FOR THEMSELVES AS RELIABLE MARKERS OF N.E.W.S. IN THIS VERY SIMPLE TEST
THE PROS & CONS OF ANGLES COVERED SKEWED BY THE OMISSION OF COVERING ALL THE RELEVANT ANGLES ON THE SURFACE AND IN THE NOOKS & CRANNIES OF HIDDEN SHADOWS OF WHAT MATTERS TO THOSE WHO RELY UPON YOUR COVERAGE
IT CANNOTBE CLAIMED THAT THE OMISSION OFINFORMATION WAS A MISTAKE WHEN THIS WAS SUCH AN IMPORTANT AND WELL KNOWN FACT
MINUS 1000 POINTS FOR N.E.W.S. ‘FAKE’ ANGLES
PLUS 1000 POINTS TO THE STAR
Live~NRGY 
Leave a comment