Live~NRGY

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0181689/

http://www.npr.org/2016/05/24/479349654/the-hidden-discrimination-in-criminal-risk-assessment-scores

http://www.bing.com/search?q=criminal+risk+assessment+algorithms&qs=n&form=QBRE&pq=criminal+risk+assessment+algorithms&sc=0-35&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=76CB8E2AC19E45A5B250B4D822F5E156

IT’S MIND BOGGLING TO COMTEMPLATE, LET ALONE BELIEVE IT’S PUT INTO PRACTICE.

SUPER CRITICAL ‘WHY’ ???

THE DECK IS STACKED AGAINST AN INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS BEEN COMPROMISED BY SOCIAL ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES TOO SUBTLE TO UNDERSTAND USING NORMAL EMPIRICAL OBSERVATION WHEN THE PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF QUANTUM/NANO SCIENCE IS INTRODUCED INTO AN ENVIRONMENT WHERE INDIVIDUALS HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO REACT TO BEHAVIOURIAL ALTERING CHEMICALS UNKNOWINGLY AND MIGHT I SUGGEST TIP THEM OVER THE EDGE WHERE THEY NORMALLY WOULD PROBABLY THINK TWICE BEFORE COMMITTING A CRIME ! THIS IS WHERE CRIMES OF PASSION REALLY SHINES THROUGH WITH CHEMICAL SOCIAL ENGINEERING. IT BECOMES MORE THAN OBVIOUS THAT SOMETHING WHEN OFF THE RAILS THAT ISN’T NORMAL.

AND IF TO BE SO BOLD – I WOULD ESTIMATE THAT BY TODAY’S COUNT… 90 PERCENT OF INCARCERATED POPULATIONS FALLS INTO THIS CATEGORY OF HAVING BEEN SOCIALY ENGINEERED INTO CORRECTIONAL AND PENAL FACILITIES. ‘MODERN DESIGNER CHEMICALS’ EVERYWHERE !!!

THE DEBATE IS NOT HOW GUILTY THEY ARE, BUT RATHER ‘HOW’ MUCH EXPOSURE TO CHEMICALS HAVE THEY BEEN SUBJECTED TO. NO DIFFERENT THAN ALCOHOLICS, 420 LONG TERM USERS, AND OTHER ADDICT POPULATIONS. LEGAL OR OTHERWISE.