NOT GOOD ENOUGH. DUE TO EXTENSIVE SECOND HAND SMOKE IN ROOMING HOUSES, I NOW CONSIDER IT NOT ONLY HARMFUL TO HEALTH BUT ALSO AS DANGEROUS TO BOTH SMOKING AND NON SMOKING TENANTS EXPOSED TO ALL TYPES OF CONTAMINATED AIR IN THE BUILDING.
ROOMING HOUSES SHOULD HAVE PROHIBITED SMOKING IN PUBLIC COMMON AREAS. AS WELL AS RETRO-FITTED AIR VENTILATION TO ACCOMODATE IN ROOM SMOKERS, BUT NOT OTHER OCCUPANTS OF THE BUILDING.
SUCH IS LIFE WHERE SMOKING IS CONSIDERED HARMFUL AND DANGEROUS TO HUMAN LIFE AND ANIMALS.
OTHERWISE GOVERNMENTS AND LANDLORDS EVERYWHERE FACE LAWSUITS. MEDICAL SCIENCE HAS SHOWN THAT SMOKING IS A DANGER TO LIFE.
PRIVACY RIGHTS IN ROOMS ARE PROTECTED, YET LANDLORDS WILL NOW HAVE TO DECIDE WHETHER IT IS IN THEIR BEST INTERESTS TO HAVE BUILDINGS ENTIRELY SMOKE FREE OR IF SMOKING IS ALLOWED, THEN PROPER AND ADEQUATE VENTILATION SO AS NOT TO CAUSE ILL HEALTH AND DISEASES IN OTHERS WITHIN THEIR BUILDINGS.
WHY??? BECAUSE IT’S 2016 ! THAT’S WHY !!!
IF IT’S NOT GOOD FOR WORKPLACES, IT’S CERTAINLY NOT GOOD FOR NON SMOKERS WHICH ARE NOT A MINORITY ANYMORE.
CHANGE LAWS WITH HEAVY FINES TO MAKE SURE THE MESSAGE GETS ACROSS AND THIS ISSUE IS TAKEN SERIOUSLY.
EVERYONE WANTED TO PLAY GAMES IN 2 DIFFERENT ROOMING HOUSES IN OTTAWA…
SO THIS IS WHERE THE RUBBER ROOMS HITS THE RABID MAD DOG !
MAKE IT SO, CAUSE I AIN’T GOING TO TAKE NO FOR AN ANSWER.
WATCH ME !
Live~NRGY 
Leave a comment