\MARK POST #6374
I’VE COME TO A CONCLUSION ON THE MATTER. IT’S BARBARIC. NOT WITH CONSENT BY THE MALE BEING CIRCUMCISED. IN ALL MATTERS, THIS HAS RELIGIOUS CONNOTATIONS, AND WITH DUE RESPECT, THIS PROCEDURE CAN TAKE PLACE ONCE A BOY HAS REACHED THE AGE OF CONSCIOUS CONSENT IN THE GEOGRAPHICAL AREA WHERE THIS IS A CUSTOM & RITUAL.
GOES FOR GIRLS TOO, IF SAFE – OTHERWISE HANDS OFF. NO CONSENT BY INNOCENCE IS ACCEPTABLE.
AS FOR PRECEDENCE… YOU WOULDN’T CUT OFF A LEG OR ARM OR ANY OTHER PARTS OF A BODY UNLESS IT WAS DEEMED ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY TO SAVE A LIFE. IN THIS CASE, CIRCUMCISION IS NOT ABOUT SAVING A LIFE, BUT ONE OF ALTERING IT TO CHANGE A SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR.
Leave a comment