Live~NRGY

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/cbc-memo-ghomeshi-dismissal/article21353114/

Okay CBC, fair enough on withholding commenting.

But here’s a critical question ?

What if there had been no prior discussion in ‘private’ between parties prior to dismissal ?

Then HOW could an informed decision to terminate be made without any direct information and only allegations in the public domain ?

Unless of course information was whisked behind the scenes !

Reminds me of the same very tactic the CAS uses to build it’s own cases and bury opposition.  That leaves a struggling party on the hook to defend its case against goliath.

If you, CBC are confident in your assertions,  then invite a guess with Peter.  Let the truth come out and exonerate in public what transpired.

Remember this though.

Many a times accusations are from corrupted sources who’s intentions were exactly that.  Hidden Social Engineering to entrap with the optics of corruption thst goes on behind the scenes.

Unless there’s a smoking gun video of he said, she said…

Adults are Adults.   Not cry babies later after the fact… months, years later doesn’t build a case to stand on 1 leg, never mind all 4 doggie style.

I’m not blasting, but the critical question is not answered.

WHO IS GONNA STEP UP FIRST ?