WAS THE CURFEW REASONABLE… YES
WAS IT JUSTIFIABLE WITH ITS OBJECTIVES – NO
NO PROOF AND DATA TO SUPPORT THE CONTENTION THAT LIMITING PUBLIC MOVEMENT HAD ANY MEASURABLE IMPACT ON THE NUMBER OF COVID PATIENTS TESTING POSITIVE AND IN ICU AND DEATH RATES…
IN MY OPINION,,,, POLITUCS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT NOT EXACTLY BEING FORTH COMING ON CRIME AND SECURITY MEASURES….
GAIN HERE WAS TO LIMIT ANY UNDERGROUND ECONOMY OF GUNS, DRUGS, SEX TRADE AND PUBLIC BEHAVIOUR THAT NORMALLY OCCURS….
NOT TO MENTION THE ENFORCEABLE(SHELTER OR JAIL) NATURE OF THE CURFEW UPON THE HOMELESS ON THE STREETS WHO ARE FAR & FEW IN BEING LEGALLY REPRESENTED IN ASSERTING RIGHTS
HOWEVER UNFORTUNATELY… WE ALL KNOW THAT NEFARIOUS ELEMENTS EASILY CHANGE M.O. TO GET AROUND RESTRICTIONS AND CURFEWS… PROHIBITION IS A PRIME EXAMPLE
CURFEW ULTIMATELY FAILED IN PRODUCING THE DESIRED OUTCOME SOUGHT POLITICALLY AND OTHERWISE…
PUBLIC SAFETY WAS NOT INCREASED AND PUBLIC RIGHTS WERE DEFINITELY IMPINGED UPON UNDER THE CONSTITUTION…
LOSS WAS GREATER THAN GAIN…
BECAUSE…
WHERE IS THE LINE TO BE DRAWN WHEN ULTERIOR MOTIVES THAN THOSE VOICED PUBLICLY BECOME THE NORM USING A CURFEW TO HIDE INTENTION AS A SAFETY MEASURE
BTW – ONE LAST WORD….
IF SUCH A CURFEW WAS TO WORK AS INTENDED…. WOULD NOT ALL OTHER JURUSDICTIONS JUMPED ON THE SAME BANDWAGON AND PLAYED OUT THE SAME TUNE TO ITS PUBLIC ???
THE MISSING ELEMENT OF EVIDENCE HERE IS THE GOVERNMENT’S OWN LACK OF PRECISE DATA TO JUSTIFY IMPLEMENTING SUCH A MEASURE….
NO DATA MEANS ITS ALL SMOKE & MIRRORS
Live~NRGY 
Leave a comment