Live~NRGY

The New York Times article ‘When Three Shots Are Not Enough‘ is an interesting eye-opener on this day as the planet hits its annual perihelion point along its orbit around the sun.

Who can argue that more is better when it comes to protection? If 2 shots and a booster does not do the trick, then why not as many as are required to do the job?

Of course the answer lies in the fact that no immediate or short term data exists to support the argument. But when it comes to grasping at life’s straws, people will jump on any medical experiment no matter what risks they are willing to submit themselves too, all in the sacred name of ‘HOPE’.

If medical science has a way forward, REGARDLESS of dissenting medical opinions and science, ‘HOPE’ becomes the mantra of stupid.

Following the lines of logic(linear to its conclusion), one could also argue that if vaccines are about to pass their best use before dates and are doomed to expire, then why not put them to good use? Only seems logical if you are only going to throw them away, is it not?

In the haste to come up with a vaccine solution, muted are the ethicists and moral arguments from both sides. In fact, if not muted by peer pressure, then being ostracized as minority voices leaves very little, but to surrender to the idiocy of the pandemic moment, whichever side of the divide you happen to be on.

Until the folly of stupidity goes through all its phases and history passes judgment, I am willing to bet that this is one chapter in human history that will be studied for all its wrong decisions in so many areas in so brief a time.

One has to wonder what would happen to decision-making if aliens landed on earth or an asteroid were hurling straight for it?

Everyone would have to fend for themselves must surely be the conclusion after this pandemic debacle.

Then maybe just maybe that is the whole point everyone is trying to voice. Letting everyone decide for themselves without mandates and peer pressure what is best for themselves. Without a doubt, going back to ‘NORMAL’ like before the pandemic will be a futile exercise of wasted arguments, disagreements and repeating the same mistakes all over again.

Societies will never ever be able to dictate 100 percent consensus.

That is a 100 percent guarantee.

SO I CAN ONLY CONCLUDE THE ‘WHY’ OF FORCING 100 PERCENT REGARDLESS OF ALL THE OTHER HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES IT PRODUCES AS A FANATIC’S BEST WET DREAM.

“BECAUSE YOU CAN BY POWER of FORCE, DOES NOT MAKE IT SO NOR RIGHT !”

However, if you want by the numbers, I can supply what stupid looks like easily!

Bottom Line

ZERO to Pi times Infinity = MASS CAN NEVER EVER DECIDE FOR THE WHOLE WHEN RUNNING IN CIRCLES CHASING ITS TAIL = IT FALLS APART AS NATURE INTENDED

History Channel, you have your work cut out. Dig in !!!